Forensic Accounting
Brand Protection
Computer Forensics
Corporate Investigation

spacer
Search

Forensic Accounting, Computer Forensics, & Corporate Investigations
The Kessler Report
THE KESSLER REPORT Continued
A Publication of Michael G. Kessler & Associates, Ltd.

Archive           Home
FraudBusters® Edition
Volume 2

Number 1

Red Flags of Money Laundering

Q & A
Featured expert:
Charles A. Intriago, ESQ
Editor of Money Laundering Alert
1-305-530-0500
www.moneylaundering.com

Q. Can a U.S. company (or individual) be prosecuted for money laundering if the company received payments that it did not know came from criminal proceeds?

A. Yes. A recent appellate case held for a money laundering conviction with no evidence that the defendant "knew" the dirty source of her customers' funds. The concept that came into play: "willful blindness," which has been defined as "purposeful and deliberate contrivance to avoid learning all the facts" (U.S. v. Campbell, 977 F2d 854 (1992).

Q. What is the liability of a business person if he/she suspects payments received have been generated from illicit activities?

A. Under the principal U.S. money laundering law, a convicted money launderer can receive a 20-year prison term and heavy fine.

           K
     Is money laundering happening right under your nose? Especially if you are in a cash business, deal in real estate or valuable assets, or are investigating or auditing a business, you need to know the warning signs:
  • Activities that are not consistent with the business.
  • Larger cash deposits or purchases than should be expected.
  • Withdrawals inconsistent with the cash needs of a business.
  • Invoices that are inordinately larger or smaller than would be expected.
  • Attempts to avoid reporting requirements.
  • Requests to be placed on a cash transaction report (CTR) exemption list.
  • Frequent deposits or purchases just under the reporting threshold.
  • Unusual fund transfer activities.
  • Transfers by attorneys or accountants on behalf of clients.
  • Transactions where both parties appear to be related entities.
  • Large or frequent transactions involving offshore banks, foreign countries or apparent shell corporations.
  • Bank information that is insufficient or suspicious.
  • Accounts in false names or in the name of persons acting for a third party.
  • Transaction documentation that appears falsified or not legally correct.
  • Reluctance to provide identifying information during an audit.
  • Sudden changes in employees’ lifestyles.
  • An employee who shows up for work in a shiny, red Mercedes convertible.
  • Employees who are resistant to taking vacations.
  • Changes in cash needs of business without corresponding increase in CTR’s.
  • Increasing use of safety deposit boxes.
  • Increased wire transfer activity.

4


Copyright © Michael G. Kessler & Associates, Ltd. 1998. All rights reserved.